Psychological Assessment of Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Single versus Multiple Keloids: A Cross-Sectional Study
Lian Zhang*, MD, PhD, Yanyu Du*, MD, Dan Sun*, MD, PeiPei Huang, Renliang He#, MD, Bin Yang#, MD
BACKGROUND
Keloids are chronic fibroproliferative disorders that cause significant physical disfigurement and psychological distress. While the psychosocial burden of keloids is documented, the differential impact of lesion multiplicity remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To compare anxiety and depression levels in patients with single versus multiple keloids and analyze correlations with physical symptoms.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study enrolled 758 patients (274 single, 484 multiple lesions). Psychological status was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), including anxiety (SAS) and depression (SDS) subscales. Physical symptoms were evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
RESULTS
Patients with multiple keloids (MK) had significantly higher SDS scores (4.80 ± 3.01) compared to single keloid patients (SK, 4.16± 2.89, p= 0.003). SAS scores were higher in the multiple group but did not reach statistical significance (p= 0.06). Conversely, SK patients reported significantly higher physical symptom scores (VSS: 10.78 ± 2.81 vs.10.10 ± 3.14, p<0.001; VAS: 4.73 ± 2.29 vs.4.21 ± 2.08, p<0.001). No significant correlation was found between psychological and physical scores (r < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Multiplicity of lesions is a significant, independent risk factor for depression in keloid patients, dissociated from physical symptom severity.
METRICS
Lian Zhang*, MD, PhD, Yanyu Du*, MD, Dan Sun*, MD, PeiPei Huang, Renliang He#, MD, Bin Yang#, MD
AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS:
Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical
University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Equal contribution: Lian Zhang, Yanyu Du,
Dan Sun
Co-senior authors: Bing Yang, Renliang He
Running Title
Psychological Assessment of Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Single versus Multiple Keloids: A Cross-Sectional Study
Word Count
194 words